Which of the two makes for a more educational or enlightening experience?
Have some noticed how comfortable, that the millions of people, have become by debating other's, via Social Media, or on some online websites?
You can turn on MSNBC, CNN, and some of the other Liberal news media outlets, and watch as they are engaging in one sided debates?
You can go to this or that website, and some are engaging in one sided debates as well.
You have millions of families, across the Globe, having one sided debates, because Hate, Discrimination, and Anger, are easy to teach to others about, from behind their closed doors, when it comes to the One Sided Debate Method.
So what's easier for some to do, to get their arguments across?
Create one sided self serving debates, online, via online debating?
Or debating face to face?
I think that some for the most part, are going to lean on their online "debate practices," because debating face to face, is a whole other type of a debate practice.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
@ZeusAres42
"@TKDB
"As for your wanting to have a public debate with me the answer is no to you only."
"I would prefer a public debate with someone far more challenging and mind taxing."
"No offense."
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 45%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 79%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.42  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 57%  
  Learn More About Debra
An example of what I'm alluding to.
@TKDB Enjoy your trolling cake of words.
And get it through to your dense skull that you are not worthy of having any kind serious debate with either online or in public.
There are plenty of worthy people here and you are not one of them. But you keep telling yourself you are a great debater that everyone is scared to have a public debate with; one day you might even convince yourself this is true.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: public debate    kind serious debate   cake of words.And   plenty of worthy people  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
So says the online debater.
Your words were easy to type, weren't they?
"And get it through to your dense skull that you are not worthy of having any kind serious debate with either online or in public."
"There are plenty of worthy people here and you are not one of them.
"But you keep telling yourself you are a great debater that everyone is scared to have a public debate with; one day you might even convince yourself this is true."
You keep telling yourself the above, because it's the only way that you know how to debate, through standard one side debating.
  Considerate: 58%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 8%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 0%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.24  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
You keep telling yourself the the above, because it's only way that you know how to debate through standard one side debating.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: online debater.Your words    online debater.You keep   standard   side  
  Relevant (Beta): 63%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 22%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 44%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.52  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: tears    Plaffelvohfen      
  Relevant (Beta): 65%  
  Learn More About Debra
@ZeusAres42
"So says the online debater.
You keep telling yourself the the above, because it's only way that you know how to debate through standard one side debating."
Your fear of debating in Public, is obvious.
I guess I'll have to fly overseas, to Publicly debate either one of you, right @ZeusAres42, and @Plaffelvohfen?
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
If you were involved neither ........
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: experience         
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
Lots of us have tried having a serious debate with you in the past but it it appears that is not your intention. So why should we waste our time having a serious debate with someone who has no intention of having a serious discussion?
Even me writing this little bit is going to prove futile via your next most likely troll post. If I won 10 bucks for every time I predicted your next post I would be a millionaire by now.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: serious debate    serious discussion   little bit   Lots  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
More of your non public debating talk:
"Lots of us have tried having a serious debate with you in the past but it it appears that is not your intention. So why should we waste our time having a serious debate with someone who has no intention of having a serious discussion?"
"Even me writing this little bit is going to prove futile via your next most likely troll post. If I won 10 bucks for every time I predicted your next post I would be a millionaire by now."
All you've accustomed yourself to doing is online debating?
@Dee
And a prime example of your non public debate talk as well.
"If you were involved neither ........"
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** And a prime example of your non public debate talk as well.
This forum is open to and used by the public , you really are terribly
  Considerate: 35%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: prime example    public debate talk   well.This forum   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
CNN, MSNBC, NPR, the NRA, the pro Marijuana movement, the pro illegal drug crowd, the pro Illegal Immigration crowd, the pro Abortion crowd, the pro Sanctuary City crowd, and the pro Liberal, and Socialist Liberal followers, or constituents fan bases, have NOTHING on the online Atheist movement.
Their movement is the Tip of the online debate iceberg.
And it's a movement, that is for the most part Global.
  Considerate: 60%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pro Marijuana movement    illegal drug crowd   online Atheists   pro Liberal  
  Relevant (Beta): 49%  
  Learn More About Debra
More of the same:
Another example of your non public debate talk as well.
"This forum is open to and used by the public , you really are terribly ."
Debating Face to Face, or online?
Is the theme of the forum.Your use of the word "," is stereotypical.
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 64%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
*****Your use of the word “” is stereotypical
I agree your stupidity is widely known and fixed and it’s an oversimplified term regarding you in keeping with your simpletons mentality
  Considerate: 29%  
  Substantial: 83%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.48  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.42  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 59%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pro Marijuana movement    illegal drug crowd   online Atheists   pro Liberal  
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Ha , Ha , that’s exactly him all over , have you ever actually seen him make a point or post up a sensible debate , I know I haven’t
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: sensible debate    point   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.94  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: personal judgement    Face   People   chamber affect  
  Relevant (Beta): 45%  
  Learn More About Debra
Just look at how people talk to each other in this thread. Would they ever talk to human beings like this in real life, calling them names to their face and mocking them openly in front of anyone? Probably not, as nobody likes people who do that, and they would be ostracised by pretty much everyone. Yet here they can do it all they want, because nobody knows who they really are.
The Internet !@#$%^& Theorem holds, as strong as ever.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: opponent throws hands    negative consequences   human beings   tangible consequences  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
"The Internet !@#$%^&; Theorem holds, as strong as ever."
The Internet is weak, it's not Real Life, or Real World.
"Just look at how people talk to each other in this thread. Would they ever talk to human beings like this in real life, calling them names to their face and mocking them openly in front of anyone? Probably not, as nobody likes people who do that, and they would be ostracised by pretty much everyone. Yet here they can do it all they want, because nobody knows who they really are."
When people are afraid to debate face to face, their weakness is worn on their faces.
And this is why millions of so called debaters, debate on the Internet, so that they can hide their faces.
Your theorem talk is sad, and irrelevant to the forum.
"In mathematics, a theorem is a non-self-evident statement that has been proven to be true, either on the basis of generally accepted statements such as axioms or on the basis previously established statements such as other theorems."
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.92  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Dee
Debate me face to face, in person?
Because I challenge both of you brave souls, to say the same rhetoric to me, in public?
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: brave souls    face   person   rhetoric  
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: brave souls    face   person   own advice  
  Relevant (Beta): 62%  
  Learn More About Debra
Please, Define the logic behind your argument?
"Why don't you practice what you preach? Take your own advice?"
Because you won't do face to face, thus your internet enabled Atheist style of debating is done from behind your computer.
You like the upper hand, or the high ground when you debate.
Thus debating face to face, means that once you saw me in REAL LIFE, you would, turn and walk away.
And that style of debating logic, is what you preach to me often.
Here's the evidence to that, because of this post that you expressed to Dee:
"@Dee
The above is how you debate.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 75%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.26  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 81%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.4  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
**** Debate me face to face, in person?
You don’t debate you Troll
****Because I challenge both of you brave souls, to say the same rhetoric to me, in public?
Well seen as you cannot defend yourself online how would you expect to do it face to face?
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.62  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: brave souls    face   person   Troll  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
No it’s not , it’s how Trolls are treated ....Are you going to burst out in tears .....again?
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 1.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Trolls    tears      
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
You just self defined how you DEBATE.
You're a sad debater.
"No, but is how I respond to trolls. When you're serious with me I'll be serious back to you."
"Apatheist meaning I simply and generally don't care if you are religious or not (belief in a God or Not) providing that you're not following and believing in something that could cause harm to oneself or others."
You're fooling yourself, where's YOUR LEGITIMATE evidence that Religion has caused harm to me or others?
, you oppose and protest me often.
I'm serious as can be, when I address your online name.
That's why I'm not AFRAID to debate you to your face.
Because I guarantee you, I'd have a great time debating YOU IN PERSON.
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 97%  
  Substantial: 11%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 0%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 0.74  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 76%  
  Learn More About Debra
Because I'd rather debate you face to face ZeusAres42, and because in person, you can't hide behind one of your typically stated arguments, like the various responses like the ones below.
And me and YOU, debating face to face has zero to do with your lip service commentary over the "Twin Towers."
"So, debating to you is about getting one over another person?"
(Did I say the above?, NO YOU DID!)
"What exactly do you gain or learn by calling other people sad individuals?"
(Because you are sad.)
"And how is that debating?"
(Because you don't know how to debate.)
"So, it's not about learning something from rational discourse?
To you, it's all about tit for tat?
And that to you is not sad debating right?"
(More of your standard ZeusAres42 lip service.)
(More of your standard ZeusAres42 lip service.)
And I've already explained countless times how radical beliefs can lead to harm such as terrorist acts, for instance, such as that attack on the Twin Towers remember?
(More of your standard ZeusAres42 lip service.)
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 87%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.86  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
Isn't the below parliamentary system how the governing individuals in your country, have debates?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_system
"Pros and cons
Seems to me that the governing individuals in your country, have their debates in the public, and pretty much face to face?
Another example of public debating.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.78  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 51%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 53%  
  Learn More About Debra
I've been peaceful the entire time, while you on the other hand been, anything but "Verbally" peaceful.
Ridicule isn't peaceful, and your condescending remarks, aren't peaceful either.
"But that is something we both agree on as you stated in another thread "I believe that anyone should be able to believe in Religion, as long as the participants are peaceful."
"That is also my position, so long as the participants are peaceful. I don't understand why you are asking me to provide evidence for something that we both agree on?"
Isn't the below parliamentary system how the governing individuals in your country, have debates?
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parliamentary_system
"Pros and cons
Seems to me that the governing individuals in your country, have their debates in the public, and pretty much face to face?
Another example of public debating.
  Considerate: 71%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.34  
  Sources: 4  
  Relevant (Beta): 61%  
  Learn More About Debra
Another Atheist, who wouldn't debate face to face, because debating like a Parliament does, is simply unworthy of the online debating technique, right?
****Which of the two makes for a more educational or enlightening experience?
"If you were involved neither ........"
***** And a prime example of your non public debate talk as well.
"This forum is open to and used by the public , you really are terribly "
"@TKDB
*****Your use of the word “” is stereotypical
I agree your stupidity is widely known and fixed and it’s an oversimplified term regarding you in keeping with your simpletons mentality
**** Debate me face to face, in person?
"You don’t debate you Troll"
****Because I challenge both of you brave souls, to say the same rhetoric to me, in public?
"Well seen as you cannot defend yourself online how would you expect to do it face to face?"
"No it’s not , it’s how Trolls are treated ....Are you going to burst out in tears .....again?"
  Considerate: 31%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.44  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
***** Another Atheist, who wouldn't debate face to face
But you still don’t debate ,you never have the whole site knows you’re a Troll
, *****because debating like a Parliament does, is simply unworthy of the online debating technique, right?
When you decide to debate let us all know in the meantime carry on Trolling
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: online debating technique    whole site   meantime carry   Troll  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
Back your word's up, where's your evidence Dee?
"But you still don’t debate ,you never have the whole site knows you’re a Troll"
"When you decide to debate let us all know in the meantime carry on Trolling"
Examples of non internet based trolling rhetoric.
Abortion, is the act of trolling on a fetus.
Race on race murder.
Non race on race murder.
Those professional people who use legalized drugs, while they practice medicine, or are providing medical care to the patients around them.
Those parents who use illegal drugs, around their own kids, or families.
The terrorists who have killed innocent people, for their own deranged causes.
Real World examples of trolling, non internet based.
And the sad part is, there are people in your own country, who debate better than you do, and they are in charge, of the country you live in.
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Hey thanks for your profile photo ......
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 17%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 4.62  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: profile photo    thanks      
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra